Copyleaks · AI content detection
Copyleaks accurately detected 100% AI generation probability with 0% plagiarism match on the 90-word pure LLM benchmark sample in 27.4 seconds. Beyond the headline score, it highlighted 15 distinct high-frequency AI phrases and delivered sentence-level diagnostic coloration, providing both precision and explainability.
US-West (California, AS2914)
JSON · Output attached · Open native file ↗
Subsequent pricing and service checks are shown separately without altering historical scores.
One run does not establish all complex scenes, untested paid maxima or long-term uptime.
Plans & historical pricing
Copyleaks Personal and Pro subscription pricing structure · 2026-10-31
AI text & image detection, 30+ languages AI detection, 100+ languages plagiarism check, Shared Data Hub
All Personal features, 25 seats, advanced filters, website scanning, cross-language translation detection, analytics dashboard
Personal tier annual features
Pro tier annual features
4 plan / billing-period records, all listed; — means that period is not recorded.
Verified monthly rates: Personal $16.99/mo, Pro $99.99/mo; explicit annual upfront invoice totals: Personal $167.88/yr ($13.99/mo), Pro $899.88/yr ($74.99/mo); extra unified credits available for top-up.
Cancellation, sources & verification record
Cancellation and refund terms unverified
Copyleaks Official Pricing Page (Annual View) ↗ · 2026-10-31 Capture 1 ↗
Copyleaks Official Pricing Page (Monthly View) ↗ · 2026-10-31 Capture 1 ↗
Pricing recorded on the test date · 2026-11-01
Free trial; Personal $16.99/mo or $167.88/yr
Freemium (free trial credits + Personal/Pro monthly/annual subscriptions)
Historical context only; not current purchase guidance.
Delivery & access
- Free delivery record
- Full sentence-level coloration + 15 AI phrase attributions
- Watermark
- Zero watermark
- Free allowance
- Free trial credits granted upon signup for full scan execution
- Account requirements
- Demo on homepage; formal scan via Google account login
- Maximum specification record
- Full sentence-level coloration + 15 AI phrase attributions + plagiarism comparison report
May include advertised capabilities; this does not establish a tested paid tier.
- Batch & API
- Supports single/batch text uploads, REST API, and MCP protocol integration
- Manual refinement
- Not recorded or not verified
Tested result & sample
Copyleaks processed the benchmark anchor in 27.38s server wait time, accurately flagging 100% AI probability and 15 phrase clusters (01_landing.png, 02_prompt_filled.png, 03_result.png).
- Fixture
- anchor_aidetector_v1
- Recorded environment
- US-West (California, AS2914)
- Network-observed server wait
- 27.38 s
- End-to-end reference
- 27.38 s
Network wait includes round trips, queuing and polling error, not pure inference time. Local timings depend on the device; repetition counts are not standardized in legacy records.
Experience, rules & trust
- Disclosure
- Input word count and remaining credits clearly visible prior to scanning
- Interaction
- Not recorded or not verified
- Entity record
- Copyleaks Inc.
- Origin
- Stamford, Connecticut, United States
- Domain history record
- Founded in 2015
- Third-party tracking record
- Google Analytics · Google Tag Manager
- External information
- Top-tier content authenticity, copyright compliance, and AIGC detection platform listed on Inc. 5000.
- Processing
- Cloud enterprise multi-layer secure sandbox and deep learning inference engine
- Retention statement
- Certified compliant with SOC 2 and GDPR standards; zero data leakage to public LLM training
A recorded statement does not verify deletion or all data-processing behavior.
Verifiable audit trail & evidence
Four SHA-256-verified stages link the benchmark fixture, same-run interface screenshots, native exported artifact and archived pricing sources.
anchor_aidetector_v1 · Inspect fixture & file inspector →
Captures entry rules, result view and export disclosure.
Copyleaks Official Pricing Page (Annual View) (snapshot ↗) · Copyleaks Official Pricing Page (Monthly View) (snapshot ↗)
Screenshots, native output and official claims support different conclusions. Evidence grades are not product safety certifications.
Evaluation basis & full scores · Overall 94.1/100
Overall = honesty & reputation × 30% + capability × 70%. Component maxima follow this report’s rubric. List scores are rounded for display; original precision is retained here.
Scoring version 2.3.1 · Test fixture anchor_aidetector_v1
Honesty & reputation · 92/100 · 30%
| Criterion | Score | Rationale | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 32 / 35 | Explanation unavailable | Evidence A → |
| Interaction restraint | 27 / 30 | Explanation unavailable | Evidence A → |
| Background & reputation | 19 / 20 | Explanation unavailable | Evidence A → |
| Engineering & privacy | 14 / 15 | Explanation unavailable | Evidence A → |
Capability · 95/100 · 70%
| Criterion | Score | Rationale | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task quality | 65 / 65 | AI Probability: 100% · Human Probability: 0% · Label: ai · Calibrated: Yes | Evidence A → |
| Deliverable specifications | 20 / 20 | Clean unwatermarked export (8/8); Export spec: Full sentence-level coloration + 15 AI phrase attributions + plagiarism comparison report | Evidence A → |
| Processing speed | 10 / 15 | Network-observed server wait: 27.38s (API mode: async_verified; network upload 0s / end-to-end 27.38s shown for reference only, never penalized) | Evidence A → |
Legacy scores may include advertised maximum capabilities. Read tested output separately from paid capabilities. Records without matching tiers and scope are not ranked together.
Revisions & corrections
- 2026-11-01
Completed live benchmark on anchor_aidetector_v1 AIGC detection precision and phrase-level explainability